Legal Opinion

Boettner v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1971No. Docket 10263PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLesinski, C. J.

We concur with the opinion of Judge Danhof insofar as it holds the so-called “other insurance” clause invalid in automobile insurance policies issued after the enactment of MCLA § 500.3010 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 24.13010).

The holding in Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (1971), 32 Mich App 115, is based upon the statutory command that every automobile insurance policy provide uninsured motorist coverage of at least $10,000 per person and $20,000 per accident. To allow insurers a proration of their liability when damages exceed the sum of the limits of the multiple policies…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. MaddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Boettner v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Employers Liability Assur. Corp., Ltd. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Beek v. Ohio Casualty Insurance CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API