Welch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.
Petitioners seek review of a decision of the court of appeals which held that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) can lawfully exclude coverage in the uninsured motorist provision of its policy for accidents involving motor vehicles owned by the insured but not included in the policy. In reaching this result, the court of appeals sanctioned the use of a “drive other car” exclusionary clause, which had the effect of validating State Farm’s attempt to prevent the insured’s stacking of policy coverages. We hold, consistent with Tahtinen v. MSI Insurance Company, decided…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Karabin v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- County of Columbia v. BylewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Tahtinen v. MSI InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Wood v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Nicholson v. Home Insurance Companies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.