Legal Opinion

Powers v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1986No. Docket Nos. 73156, 73691, 74136, 76091, 76427, (Calendar Nos. 1-5)PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C.J.

In these five cases we again consider the validity of the so-called "owned vehicle” exclusion in policies of no-fault automobile insurance.

The claimants in these cases are all insureds under the terms of the policies at issue, in one case because the claimant is the named policyholder and in the remaining cases because the *607policies cover the claimants as relatives residing in the same household as the policyholder.

The policies state that coverage is provided to insured persons while driving "the owned automobile” and also while driving "a nonowned automobile.” The claimants contend that they…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Zurich Insurance Co. v. RomboughMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Just v. Land Reclamation Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API