O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
(to reverse). Section 3109(1)1 of the Michigan No-Fault Insurance Act2 requires that the amount of benefits payable under any no-fault insurance policy must be reduced by the amount of benefits payable to a beneficiary by the state or Federal government, but it does not also require an analogous set-off of benefits payable to a beneficiary by private health or accident insurance programs, which persons may voluntarily add to the basic no-fault insurance. The principal question presented is whether § 3109(1) discriminates against the recipients of government benefits in violation of the Equal…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by185 opinions
- Joseph v. Auto Club Insurance AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Thornton v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.