Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1979No. 58833, (Calendar No. 13)PublishedCited by 185 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

(to reverse). Section 3109(1)1 of the Michigan No-Fault Insurance Act2 requires that the amount of benefits payable under any no-fault insurance policy must be reduced by the amount of benefits payable to a beneficiary by the state or Federal government, but it does not also require an analogous set-off of benefits payable to a beneficiary by private health or accident insurance programs, which persons may voluntarily add to the basic no-fault insurance. The principal question presented is whether § 3109(1) discriminates against the recipients of government benefits in violation of the Equal…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by185 opinions

  1. Joseph v. Auto Club Insurance AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Thornton v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API