Legal Opinion
Vernon E. Spencer v. Stuart Hall Company, Inc., a Missouri Corporation Newell Company, a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 12, 1999No. 98-1832PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Vernon Spencer received a favorable jury verdict on the age discrimination claim he brought against Stuart Hall Company, Inc., and Newell Company (collectively Stuart Hall) after he was terminated during a reduction in force (RIF). Stuart Hall appeals from the district court’s 1 denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law (JAML). We affirm.
I
Because this is an appeal from the denial of a motion for JAML, we consider the facts in the light most favorable to the winning party, construing any ambiguities and making any reasonable inferences in favor of the verdict.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Paul BEVAN, Cross-Appellant/Appellee, v. HONEYWELL, INC., Appellant/Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Carl W. Walton v. McDonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Wayne WomochilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Craig Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Tracey Lust v. Sealy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Big D Enterprises, Inc. Dr. Edwin G. DooleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Michael Johnson v. At & T Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Vernon E. Christensen v. Titan Distribution, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.