Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul A. Bilzerian
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 3, 1991No. 787, Docket 89-1502PublishedCited by 609 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
One of the principal questions posed by this appeal is whether the availability of civil proceedings — often used to enforce the securities laws — forecloses the government from instituting criminal prosecution for the violation of these same laws. The complex contrivances revealed in the present record, such as “parking” stock at a brokerage firm in order to create the impression that the stock has been sold, or having a broker “aceululate” stock on an investor’s behalf in order to delay disclosure of the purchase, carry home the meaning of Scott’s “0, what a tangled…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by609 opinions
- Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- San Leandro Emergency Medical Group Profit Sharing Plan v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Nimely v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
604 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.