Legal Opinion

United States v. Big D Enterprises, Inc. Dr. Edwin G. Dooley

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 10, 1999No. 98-2861PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHansen, Circuit J.

Following a trial in district court, 1 a twelve-person jury found that Big D Enterprises, Inc., and Dr. Edwin G. Dooley (collectively appellants) violated the Fair Housing Act (FHA) when they denied rental housing to applicants based on race. The jury awarded $1,000 in compensatory damages and $100,000 in punitive damages to three victims of appellants’ discrimination. Big D Enterprises and Dr. Dooley appeal. We affirm.

I

FACTS

Dr. Dooley owns three apartment complexes. in Fort Smith, Arkansas. Dr. Dooley is also the president, sole officer, and sole shareholder of a corporation known as Big D…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Chainey v. StreetCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Hampton v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. Mendez v. County of San BernardinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Jodie Henderson v. Simmons Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. Timothy L. Moysis, Appellee/cross v. Dtg Datanet, Formerly Known as Futuristic, Inc., Formerly Doing Business as Computerland, Inc., Appellant/crossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API