Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Fireman's Fund Insurance v. McDonald, Hecht & Solberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1994No. D017319PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KREMER, P. J.

Plaintiffs Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, General Star Indemnity Company, and North Star Reinsurance Corporation (together Insurers) appeal a judgment of dismissal entered after the superior court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer of defendants McDonald, Hecht & Solberg et al. (together Law Firm) 1 to Insurers’ cause of action in subrogation for legal malpractice. Seeking reversal of their dismissal as plaintiffs in this lawsuit, Insurers contend the court erred in concluding California law prohibited prosecution of a legal malpractice cause of action by a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. J.R. Marketing, L.L.C.California Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Martin v. Bridgeport Community Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Unigard Insurance Group v. O'Flaherty & BelgumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. SalterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API