Unigard Insurance Group v. O'Flaherty & Belgum
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of defendants following the grant of their motion for nonsuit in a legal malpractice action. We conclude that in granting a nonsuit, the trial court erroneously mled as a matter of law on an issue which, under the circumstances of this case, is one of fact: whether defendants breached the professional standard of care by adequately and timely alleging the affirmative defenses of exclusivity of workers’ compensation and Witt v. Jackson (1961) 57 Cal.2d 57 [17 Cal.Rptr. 369, 366 P.2d 641]. We also conclude that under the circumstances of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Chandler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Nevada Yellow Cab Corp. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Federal InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Blanks v. Seyfarth Shaw LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Cruey v. Gannett Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.