Legal Opinion

Unigard Insurance Group v. O'Flaherty & Belgum

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1995No. B074284PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of defendants following the grant of their motion for nonsuit in a legal malpractice action. We conclude that in granting a nonsuit, the trial court erroneously mled as a matter of law on an issue which, under the circumstances of this case, is one of fact: whether defendants breached the professional standard of care by adequately and timely alleging the affirmative defenses of exclusivity of workers’ compensation and Witt v. Jackson (1961) 57 Cal.2d 57 [17 Cal.Rptr. 369, 366 P.2d 641]. We also conclude that under the circumstances of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Chandler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Nevada Yellow Cab Corp. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Federal InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Blanks v. Seyfarth Shaw LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Cruey v. Gannett Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API