Legal Opinion
Buckaloo v. Johnson
California Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1975No. L.A. 30400PublishedCited by 190 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
A real estate broker denied his commission alleged to be due and owing on the sale of certain real property brought this action against defendants, the vendor and vendee of the property and members of the vendee group. Plaintiff’s principal allegation is that the acts of defendants constituted the tort of intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. Defendants’ demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and after plaintiff declined to amend the action was dismissed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 581, subd. 3.) We reverse in part and affirm in part.
The facts alleged in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- GLENN v. Point Park CollegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Harris v. PerlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Wilson v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by190 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
- Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.