Legal Opinion

Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 13, 1997No. 1 CA-CV 93-0461, 1 CA-CV 93-0442PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, GARBARINO and WEISBERG, Judges.

The plaintiffs are Standard Chartered PLC, a British banking corporation^ and two of its subsidiaries, Standard Chartered Bank and Standard Chartered Overseas Holdings, Ltd. (collectively “SC”). The defendant is Price Waterhouse, an accounting firm (“PW”). SC brought this action as assignee or successor in interest to certain tort and statutory damages claims owned originally by Union Bancorp of California (“Union”) and United Bank of Arizona (“United”). The gravamen of the action is that Union was caused to buy United, a bank that it would not…

2Cases cited108 opinions

  1. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Kuehn v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Walpert, Smullian & Blumenthal, P.A. v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API