Hartford Casualty Insurance v. J.R. Marketing, L.L.C.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CUÉLLAR, J.
This court has long maintained that if any claims in a third party complaint against a person or entity protected by a commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policy are even potentially covered by the policy, the insurer must provide its insured with a defense to all the claims. (E.g., Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B. (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1076, 1081 [17 *992Cal.Rptr.2d 210, 846 P.2d 792].) The insurer’s provision of an immediate, complete defense in such a “mixed” action, we have explained, is “prophylactically” necessary, even if outside of the policy’s strict terms, to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Peterson v. Cellco PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Bruton v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Mktg. & Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Santa Clara Waste Water Co. v. Allied World Nat'l Assurance Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.