Martin v. Bridgeport Community Assn., Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JACKSON, J.—
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs James A. Martin and his wife, RaeAnn, appeal from a judgment against them, including the award of attorney’s fees and costs, entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer in favor of defendant Bridgeport Community Association. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Richard and Rachel Peterson (the Petersons) purchased a home constructed by Richmond American Homes (Richmond) in a planned development community named Bridgeport in Santa Clarita at 23944 Windward Lane, lot 33 (the Property). The Bridgeport Community Association, Inc. (BCA), was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Zeth S.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Agence France Presse v. MorelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Lewis v. Youtube, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Tepper v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Chao Fu, Inc. v. Wen Ching ChenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.