Legal Opinion

Martin v. Bridgeport Community Assn., Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 2009No. B206686PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JACKSON, J.—

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs James A. Martin and his wife, RaeAnn, appeal from a judgment against them, including the award of attorney’s fees and costs, entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer in favor of defendant Bridgeport Community Association. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Richard and Rachel Peterson (the Petersons) purchased a home constructed by Richmond American Homes (Richmond) in a planned development community named Bridgeport in Santa Clarita at 23944 Windward Lane, lot 33 (the Property). The Bridgeport Community Association, Inc. (BCA), was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Zeth S.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Agence France Presse v. MorelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Lewis v. Youtube, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Tepper v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Chao Fu, Inc. v. Wen Ching ChenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API