Legal Opinion

State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. Oryshkewych

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1992No. 92-1285PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Ohio Civ.R. 56(C)’s application to this case requires relator to establish, among other things, an entitlement to a writ of prohibition as a matter of law. This includes demonstrating that denial of the writ “would cause injury for which there is no other adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.” State ex rel. Independence Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp. Relations Bd. (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 134, 136, 580 N.E.2d 430, 431. Because relator cannot establish imminent injury or the unavailability of an adequate legal remedy, we overrule relator’s motion for summary judgment.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Gilla v. FellerhoffOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State Ex Rel. Caley v. Tax CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State ex rel. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners v. State Personnel Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State ex rel. Independence Local School District Board of Education v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Koren v. GroganOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Hunter v. Summit County Human Resource CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Hunter v. Summit Cty. Human Resource Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State Ex Rel. Corn v. RussoOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Koren v. GroganOhio Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API