Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners v. State Personnel Board of Review

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1989No. 88-202PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

A writ of prohibition will not issue unless relator establishes that the court or officer against whom it is sought is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, the exercise of such power is unauthorized by law, and it will result in injury for which no other adequate remedy exists. State, ex rel. Yates, v. Court of Appeals for Montgomery Cty. (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 30, 33, 512 N.E. 2d 343, 346; Bobb v. Marchant (1984), 14 Ohio St. 3d 1, 3, 14 OBR 1, 2, 469 N.E. 2d 847, 849; State, ex rel. Flower, v. Rocker (1977), 52 Ohio St. 2d 160, 162, 6 O.O. 3d 375, 376, 370 N.E. 2d 479, 480.

Her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bobb v. MarchantOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State ex rel. Yates v. Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Flower v. RockerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State ex rel. B. F. Goodrich Chemical Div. v. GriffinOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cuyahoga County v. State Personnel Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Hunter v. Summit County Human Resource CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Cuyahoga Cty. v. State Personnel Bd. of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. City of Canfield v. FrostOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Hunter v. Summit Cty. Human Resource Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API