State ex rel. Gilla v. Fellerhoff
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The question to be decided is whether relator states a cause of action in prohibition.
It is well-settled that:
“A court having general jurisdiction of the subject matter of an action has authority to determine its own jurisdiction on issue raised, and a party challenging its jurisdiction has a remedy at law in appeal from an adverse holding of the court that it has such jurisdiction, and may not maintain a proceeding in prohibition to prevent the prosecution of such action.” Paragraph three of the syllabus in State, ex rel. Miller, v. Court of Common Pleas (1949), 151 Ohio St. 397; State, ex…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- State ex rel. Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. KornowskiOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- State ex rel. Gonzales v. PattonOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Toerner v. Common Pleas CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. GwinOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Tilford v. CrushOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Johnson v. County CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Henry v. BrittOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Ruessman v. FlanaganOhio Supreme Court · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.