Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Corn v. Russo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1999No. 75349PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Terrence O’Donnell, Judge.

Relators, Robert Corn, M.D., Highland Musculo-Skeletal Associates, Inc. (“HMSA”), Douglas DiPalma, Esq., and the law firm of Cavitch, Familo, Durkin & Frutkin, L.P.A., filed a verified complaint in our court against respondents, Judge Nancy Russo, Judge Daniel Gaul, and attorney Robert Housel, seeking a writ of prohibition to prevent respondent Russo from conducting .a contempt proceeding and a writ of mandamus to compel the return of Corn’s federal income tax returns. Respondents Russo and Gaul have moved for summary judgment and Russo has separately requested…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kala v. Aluminum Smelting & Refining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Enyart v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Barclays Bank PLC v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Corn v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Westfall v. CrossOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Corn v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API