Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hunter v. Summit County Human Resource Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1998No. 97-1002PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Judge Hunter asserts in her sole proposition of law that the court of appeals erred by dismissing her prohibition action because the commission patently and unambiguously lacks jurisdiction over the discharged employees’ appeal. In order to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, it must appear beyond doubt that relator can prove no set of facts warranting relief, after all factual allegations of the complaint are presumed true and all reasonable inferences are made in relator’s favor. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. Schroeder (1996), 76 Ohio…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Litty v. LeskovyanskyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Department of Administrative Services v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Barclays Bank PLC v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Albright v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Lorain County Community CollegeOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Cuyahoga County v. State Personnel Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Baker v. State Personnel Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Dunn v. BruzzeseOhio Court of Appeals · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API