Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Caley v. Tax Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1934No. 24970PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"Wilkin, J.

The demurrer raises a question as to the availability of the remedy sought. Do the facts set forth in the petition justify the issuance of a writ of prohibition?

As has been stated in earlier opinions in this court, three conditions are necessary to warrant that high prerogative writ:

1. The court or officer against whom it is sought must be about to exercise judicial or gmsi-judicial power.

2. The exercise of such power must be unauthorized by law.

3. It must appear that the refusal of the writ would result in injury for which there is no other adequate remedy. State, ex rel. Nolan,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carmody v. JusticeOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Silliman v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'n v. Common Pleas CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Northern Ohio Telephone Co. v. WinterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State ex rel. Phillips v. PolcarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State ex rel. Fraternal Order of Police v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State ex rel. Lehmann v. CmichOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. OryshkewychOhio Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API