State ex rel. Koren v. Grogan
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In order to obtain a writ of prohibition, relator must prove: (1) that the court or officer against whom the writ is sought is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, (2) that the exercise of that power is unauthorized by law, and (3) that denying a writ will result in injury for which no other adequate remedy exists in the ordinary course of law. State ex rel. Ruessman v. Flanagan (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 464, 465, 605 N.E.2d 31, 33. The parties agree that the first prong of the foregoing test is met here, i.e., appellant is about to exercise judicial power over the criminal case…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Sanquily v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Lambdin v. BrentonOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- State ex rel. Ruessman v. FlanaganOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Leis v. OutcaltOhio Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Turner v. Central Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Kaylor v. BrueningOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Whitehall ex rel. Wolfe v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Lipinski v. Cuyahoga County Common Pleas CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1995
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.