Legal Opinion
Popp v. County of Winona
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 4, 1988No. C2-88-695PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RONALD E. HACHEY, Judge.
Appellants Ricky Popp and Mary Popp appeal from an order quashing their alternative writ of mandamus. The alternative writ directed respondent County of Winona to commence condemnation proceedings for the taking of appellants’ property in connection with the widening of a county road, or in the alternative, show cause why it had not done so. After a show cause hearing and the submission of briefs, the trial court quashed the writ and denied any further relief to appellants. We affirm.
FACTS
The Popps have been owners of a homestead fronting on East Burns Valley…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State ex rel. Banner Grain Co. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Headley v. City of NorthfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Bryant v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Barfnecht v. Town Board of Hollywood TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coyle v. City of DelanoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Grossman Investments v. State Ex Rel. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Haen v. Renville County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Hoskin v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Pole v. TrudeauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.