Legal Opinion

Pole v. Trudeau

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 17, 1994No. C1-93-2291PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Respondent John F. Pole attempted to redeem from the first of two foreclosures of the same mortgage, but the sheriff refused his tender. Pole then sought mandamus to compel the sheriff to accept his redemption. The district court ruled that appellant Collateral Acquisition Corporation (CAC) had inappropriately attempted to cancel the first foreclosure without a judicial proceeding. The district court ordered the sheriff to accept Pole’s redemption. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1987, Gerald F. and Gail M. Oestreich mortgaged their homestead to Meritor Credit Corp. for $152,000. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Peterson v. First National Bank of CeylonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Graybow-Daniels Co. v. PinottiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Thompson v. Town of BerlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McNeill Family Trust v. Centura BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Sandra Fiecke-Stifter v. MidCountry BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API