Hoskin v. City of Eagan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge *
Respondent property owner petitioned appellant city to vacate its existing public utility and drainage easements so that respondent could subdivide his property. After appellant denied respondent’s request, respondent sought mandamus, which the district court issued. Appellant now seeks review of the court’s order issuing mandamus, arguing that mandamus was not the appropriate method to challenge its decision because mandamus applies to ministerial rather than legislative acts. Appellant further argues that, even if mandamus was the appropriate method to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- McIntosh v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Kari v. City of MaplewoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State ex rel. Banner Grain Co. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006