Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Gustafson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 1950No. 34,775PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment permanently enjoining defendants— and all persons acting under them — from preventing plaintiffs and any other lot owners, inclusive of their families and guests, from using the entire length and width of a strip of land or roadway designated as Maple Lane.

In 1908, the Minnetonka Realty Company, a corporation, as the fee owner of an island caused the same to be surveyed and platted into 42 lots as “Shady Island, Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota,” in full compliance with the requirements of M. S. A. c. 505. The instrument of dedication annexed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Rowan's Ex'rs v. Town of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  3. Village of Newport v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Bacon v. Onset Bay Grove Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Village of Wayzata v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet TahoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Payne v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Farnes v. Freeman LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Flynn v. BeiselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Nettleton Church of Christ v. ConwillMississippi Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API