Legal Opinion
Grossman Investments v. State Ex Rel. Humphrey
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 18, 1997No. CX-97-628PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Appellants Grossman Investments and Metropolitan Corporation challenge the trial court’s denial of their petition for writ of mandamus. The trial court concluded that no compensable property rights had been taken from appellants. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants are lessees and owners of property abutting Interstate 394 (1-394), previously U.S. Highway 12, in St. Louis Park. Appellant Metropolitan Corporation operates an automobile dealership, Prestige Lincoln-Mercury (Prestige), and leases the property from appellant Grossman Investments. In 1990 and 1991, the State of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State v. Gannons Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Johnson v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Oliver v. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Dale Properties, LLC v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Geyso v. DalyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Grossman Investments v. State Ex Rel. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.