Legal Opinion
Coyle v. City of Delano
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 10, 1995No. C6-94-1146PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
Martha and Ben Coyle (“the Coyles”) filed a petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus seeking the return of their dog, an award of costs, and punitive damages. The City of Delano (“city”) and the Delano City Council (“council”) moved to dismiss. The Coyles filed an amended petition to compel information on the whereabouts of their dog, facilitation toward the return of their dog, and an award of costs and punitive damages. The Wright County Humane Society (“humane society”) orally moved to dismiss the Coyles’ petition. After a hearing, the trial court concluded the dog…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Utecht v. Shopko Department StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Coduti v. HauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- State ex rel. Banner Grain Co. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State ex rel. Schwartzkopf v. City Council of BrainerdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Victor Co. v. State Ex Rel. HeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Demolition Landfill Services, LLC v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Vern Reynolds Construction, Inc. v. City of ChamplinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Chanhassen Chiropractic Center, P.A. v. City of ChanhassenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.