Legal Opinion
Haen v. Renville County Board of Commissioners
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 9, 1993No. C9-92-1511PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellants, Francis and Ann Haen and Gary and Victoria Eekhoff, seek a peremptory writ of mandamus. On appeal from the partial denial of their petition, they argue the trial court erred in concluding that Renville County officials did not act arbitrarily and capriciously and also followed the proper procedures in approving ValAdCo’s application for a conditional use permit. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent ValAdCo, a farmer-owned cooperative, seeks to build a hog breeding facility in section 34 of Crooks Township in Renville County. Appellants live near the site. The site is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Barton Contracting Co., Inc. v. City of AftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- McIntosh v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State ex rel. Currie v. WeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Manco of Fairmont, Inc. v. Town Board of Rock Dell TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Beca of Alexandria, L.L.P. v. County of Douglas Ex Rel. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Mid-City Hotel Associates v. Hennepin County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Brian Winczewski, Relator v. Becker County Board of Commissioners, Osage Sportsman Club, Inc., n/k/a Osage Sportsmens Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016