Valentine v. PPG Industries, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
{¶ 1} Linda Valentine appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in PPG Industries Ohio, Inc.’s favor and various discovery orders. She contests the court’s determination that she failed to establish a right to participate in the workers’ compensation system for the death of her husband, David Valentine (“Valentine”). Specifically, she asserts that the court improperly found her experts’ opinions regarding proximate cause to be unreliable and, thus, inadmissible. Without expert testimony, the court concluded that no genuine issue of material fact remained concerning whether…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Terry v. CaputoOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Pluck v. BP Oil Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In re Mirena Ius Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. II)District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Chase Home Fin., L.L.C. v. DunlapOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.