State ex rel. Evans v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
The appropriate form of postadministrative relief from an Industrial Commission decision depends on whether that decision determines an employee’s right to participate in the State Insurance Fund. Under R.C. 4123.519, an employer or claimant can appeal only those decisions that involve a claimant’s right to participate or to continue to participate in the fund. Afrates v. Lorain (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 22, 584 N.E.2d 1175. If a claimant can appeal under R.C. 4123.519, the claimant is not entitled to a writ of mandamus because he or she has an adequate remedy available at law.2 State ex rel.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Cook v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Felty v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Karmasu v. TateOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Cole v. Complete Auto Transit, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
- State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.