Legal Opinion
Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 11, 2000No. AC 18541PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court after granting the defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiffs complaint. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly determined that General Statutes § 31-293U1 does *327not permit him to bring an action against his employer on the theory of vicarious liability for the negligence of the plaintiffs fellow employee in the operation of a motor vehicle. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are necessary to our resolution of this appeal. On June 7, 1995, the plaintiff,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Blancato v. Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hyllen-Davey v. Plan & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Pantanella v. Enfield Ford, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Hummel v. Marten Transport, Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Correa v. WardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.