Legal Opinion

Correa v. Ward

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 30, 2005No. AC 25574PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

The defendant Kimberly Ward 1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment of eviction in the underlying summary process action. The court found that although the defendant established a presumption of retaliatory eviction under General Statutes § 47a-20, 2 the plaintiff landlord, Jose M. Correa, rebutted that presumption. On appeal, the defendant claims that the plaintiffs proffered rebuttal did not satisfy any of the grounds listed in General Statutes § 47a-20a 3 and that the court improperly interpreted those grounds not to be exclusive. We agree with the defendant and,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Capalbo v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Carmel Hollow Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. Wasko v. ManellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Visco v. CodyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. DickalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  2. Wilson v. JeffersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Chesler v. City of DerbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. DickalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Holdmeyer v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API