Correa v. Ward
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendant Kimberly Ward 1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment of eviction in the underlying summary process action. The court found that although the defendant established a presumption of retaliatory eviction under General Statutes § 47a-20, 2 the plaintiff landlord, Jose M. Correa, rebutted that presumption. On appeal, the defendant claims that the plaintiffs proffered rebuttal did not satisfy any of the grounds listed in General Statutes § 47a-20a 3 and that the court improperly interpreted those grounds not to be exclusive. We agree with the defendant and,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Capalbo v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Carmel Hollow Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Wasko v. ManellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Visco v. CodyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. DickalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Wilson v. JeffersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Chesler v. City of DerbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. DickalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Holdmeyer v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.