Legal Opinion
Pantanella v. Enfield Ford, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 14, 2001No. AC 20453PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The defendant Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association (CIGA)1 appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the finding and award of compensa*48tion and attorney’s fees by the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) to the plaintiff, Daniel Pantanella. On appeal, CIGA claims that the commissioner improperly (1) concluded that the plaintiff is entitled to attorney’s fees, (2) concluded that CIGA waived any statute of limitation defense, (3) failed to grant its motion to correct and (4) abused his discretion by failing to grant…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Elliot v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Hunnihan v. Mattatuck Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Potvin v. Lincoln Service & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Mitchell v. SilversteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Safford v. Owens BrockwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- DiBlase v. Logistec Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.