Legal Opinion

Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 12, 1997No. SC 15398PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

At issue in this appeal is whether Genera Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 31-293' (a),1 which authorizes *377employers who have made workers’ compensation payments to employees injured by a third party to take action to recover those payments from that third party, entitles an employer to make such a claim against any recovery the employee may be due under the employee’s own uninsured motorist provision of his or her automobile insurance policy. We conclude that any amounts an employee may receive from his or her uninsured motorist coverage are not within the reach of § 31-293 (a), and,…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Mendillo v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Alvarez v. New Haven Register, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API