Legal Opinion
Nasha L.L.C. v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 2004No. B167071PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Plaintiff and appellant Nasha L.L.C. (Nasha) appeals a judgment denying its petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5), 1 wherein Nasha sought to overturn an adverse decision by the South Valley Area Planning Commission (Planning Commission). 2
The essential issue presented is whether the Planning Commission’s decision should be set aside due to an unacceptable probability of actual bias on the part of one of the decision makers.
While this matter was pending before the Planning Commission, one of its members authored an article attacking the project under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Nightlife Partners, Ltd. v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Hongsathavij v. Queen of Angels/Hollywood Presbyterian Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Gai v. City of SelmaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- NBS Imaging Systems, Inc. v. State Bd. of ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Doe v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Doe v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- San Francisco Tomorrow v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- City of Rancho Cucamonga v. Regional Water Quality Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.