Legal Opinion
Gai v. City of Selma
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 3, 1998No. F026581PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THAXTER, J.
Statement of the Facts and Case
Appellant Dennis Z. Gai (Gai) was employed as a police officer with the Selma Police Department. On November 8, 1989, Gai was served with “Notice of Intended Disciplinary Action,” proposing his employment as a peace officer be terminated for stated reasons. Gai responded to the notice and on or about December 5, 1989, he was served with notice of termination based on the same charges of misconduct. The termination was effective November 15, 1989.
Gai appealed the decision to terminate his employment to the Selma Personnel Commission (Commission)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Haas v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Nasha L.L.C. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. ShewryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Southern California Underground Contractors, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.