Legal Opinion

Doe v. Regents of the University of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 2016No. D068901PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

John Doe and Jane Roe 1 were students at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), when they began a romantic relationship. A few months after their relationship ended, Jane made a complaint to UCSD’s office of student conduct (OSC) that John had sexually assaulted her. An investigator from UCSD’s office for the prevention of harassment and discrimination (OPHD) began an investigation, and Jane submitted a written request for a formal investigation. The investigator produced a report indicating it was more likely than not that John digitally penetrated Jane’s…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. St. John Dixon v. Alabama State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. John Doe v. Regents of the UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. John Doe v. Univ. of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. Doe v. Claremont McKenna Coll., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Doe v. Allee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Doe v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API