Legal Opinion
City of Rancho Cucamonga v. Regional Water Quality Control Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 2006No. E037079PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GAUT, J.
1. Introduction
This case involves environmental regulation of municipal storm sewers that carry excess water runoff to the Santa Ana River as it passes through San Bernardino County on its way to the Pacific Ocean. Federal and state laws impose regulatory controls on storm sewer discharges. Municipalities are required to obtain and comply with a federal regulatory permit limiting the quantity and quality of water runoff that can be discharged from these storm sewer systems.
In this instance, the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Santa Ana Region (the Regional Board)…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Environmental Protection Agency v. California Ex Rel. State Water Resources Control BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arkansas v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Battery Council International, Respondents-IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- City of Burbank v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. California State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Department of Finance v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- County of Los Angeles v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Harrington v. City of Davis, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- City of Arcadia v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.