Legal Opinion
Nightlife Partners, Ltd. v. City of Beverly Hills
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 24, 2003No. B161436PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
The City of Beverly Hills (City) appeals from an order granting Nightlife Partners, Ltd.; Entertainment Associates of L.A., Inc.; Déjá Vu Showgirls of Beverly Hills, LLC and Déjá Vu Consulting, Inc. (collectively Petitioners), a new administrative hearing. There is substantial evidence to support the trial court’s determination that Petitioners are entitled to a new hearing, and we therefore affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
Petitioners operate a cabaret in City, pursuant to the adult entertainment regulatory permit (permit) required by City’s municipal code. At all…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Nasha L.L.C. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Botsko v. Davenport Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.