Legal Opinion

Balough v. Fairbanks North Star Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2000No. S-8141PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Lorraine Balough and Jerome Stempak (collectively “Balough”) appeal a superior court judgment affirming the Fairbanks Board of Adjustment’s (BOA) decision denying Balough’s junkyard “nonconforming use” status.

Balough also appeals the superior court’s judgment granting to the Fairbanks North Star Borough (FNSB) summary judgment on all of Balough’s remaining claims.

We conclude that the judgment of the superior court affirming the decision of the BOA must be reversed and remanded to the BOA for further proceedings. We affirm the judgment dismissing the…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Nasierowski Brothers Investment Company v. City of Sterling HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Prentzel v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. City of Fairbanks v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Midgett v. Cook Inlet Pre-Trial FacilityAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API