Legal Opinion
City of Nome v. Catholic Bishop of Northern Alaska
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided October 4, 1985No. S-37, S-38 and S-36PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Chief Justice.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.INTRODUCTION .874
II.STANDARD OF REVIEW .875
III. PROCEDURAL ISSUES .876
A. Remand .876
B. Standing .877
C. Stay of Taxes .877
IV. PRELIMINARY ISSUES .878
A. “Exclusive Use” is Required .879
B. Spatial Apportionment is Required .881
V.RELIGIOUS RESIDENCES .881
A. May a Single Parish Contain More Than One Exempt Residence? .882
B. May the Residence of an Assistant Pastor be Exempt? .. 882
C. Must a Pastor be Available and Committed Exclusively as a Clergyman for a Local Congregation in Order to Have an Exempt Residence? .883
D. Is the Residence of a Religious…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Rivera Santiago v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
- In Re Maple Tree PlaceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Maurer v. Young LifeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Breck v. MooreAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Johns v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.