Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Native Village of Eklutna v. Board of Adjustment for the Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2000No. S-8695PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTTON

This case concerns the issuance by the Planning and Zoning Commission of a conditional use permit for a granite mining operation to the National Bank of Alaska. The decision granting the permit is challenged by the Native Village of Eklutna. Because the Commission failed to consider properly the potential historical significance of the area, we vacate the decision of the Board of Adjustment and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Facts

National Bank of Alaska (Bank) owns 160 acres of land north of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. South Anchorage Concerned Coalition, Inc. v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Southwest Marine, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities, Division of Alaska Marine Highway SystemsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Donnybrook Building Supply Co. v. Alaska National Bank of the NorthAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Winschel v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Native Village of Eklutna v. Alaska RailroadAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Northwest Medical Imaging, Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Conkey v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. South Anchorage Concerned Coalition, Inc. v. Municipality of Anchorage Board of AdjustmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API