Legal Opinion

Keiner v. City of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1963No. 240PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

Following an administrative hearing, the City of Anchorage declared Keiner’s building to be a fire and health hazard and a public nuisance and ordered it removed. On appeal to the superior court Keiner’s request for a de novo hearing was refused, the case was heard on the record, and the city’s determination was affirmed. On appeal to this court Keiner makes two main points: (1) that he was entitled to a trial de novo in the superior court; and (2) that the evidence produced at the administrative hearing did not justify removal of the building.

The Code of Ordinances of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re HansonAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API