Legal Opinion

Cook Inlet Pipe Line Co. v. Alaska Public Utilities Commission

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1992No. S-4144PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This appeal arises out of Cook Inlet Pipe Line Company’s (CIPL) challenges to intrastate crude oil transportation tariffs ordered by the Alaska Public Utilities Commission (APUC) under the authority of Alaska’s Pipeline Act. At the foundation of the dispute is the APUC’s use of an “original cost method” for reviewing intrastate tariffs. CIPL notes that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which regulates interstate tariffs, used a different rate setting method for the relevant time period. According to CIPL, use of these different methods resulted in…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. South Anchorage Concerned Coalition, Inc. v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Municipality of Anchorage, Police & Fire Retirement Board v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Marlow v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API