Lazy Mountain Land Club v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment & Appeals
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
Lazy Mountain Land Club (LMLC), a limited partnership, appeals the denial of a conditional use permit by the Matanuska-Susit-na Board of Adjustment and Appeals. LMLC argues that MSB 17.60, the borough zoning ordinance requiring the permit, is invalid because it was not adopted “in accordance with” or “in order to implement” a validly enacted comprehensive plan as required by AS 29.40.040. Alternatively, LMLC argues both that MSB 17.60 is unconstitutionally vague, and that by its own terms it is not applicable to LMLC’s proposed land use.
I. FACTS & PROCEEDINGS
Lazy…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- McGlothlin v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Button v. Haines BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Laborers Local No. 942 v. LampkinAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.