State v. Hart
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.
The defendant stresses his exceptions to the disallowance of his counsel’s cross-examination of the State’s witnesses Willie Lockamy and Floyd Suitt, Jr., as to their having brought civil actions against him based on the identical acts involved in this criminal prosecution.
Truth does not come to all witnesses in naked simplicity. It is likely to come to the biased or interested witness as the image of a rod comes to the beholder through the water, bent and distorted by his bias or interest. The law is mindful of this plain psychological principle when it fashions rules of evidence to aid…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Villaroman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1842
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. PoolosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Klimas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- State v. DoughtySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- State v. LuzziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.