Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Moye

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1970No. 16PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

The trial judge instructed the jury that by statute, G.S. 20-138, it is unlawful for any person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor to drive any vehicle upon the highways within this State and that a violation of this statute is negligence per se. Watters v. Parrish, 252 N.C. 787, 115 S.E. 2d 1. He explained that a person is under the influence of intoxicating liquor within the meaning of the statute when he has drunk a sufficient quantity of intoxicating beverage to cause him to lose the normal control of his bodily or mental faculties, or both, to such an extent…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Boehm Ex Rel. v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. State v. HewittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Osler v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. RichSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Yancey v. LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  4. McKenna v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. McKenzieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API