Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. . Melts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 23, 1942PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'WiNBOBNE, J.

When the evidence shown in the record, portraying the factual situation surrounding the death of plaintiff’s intestate, is taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, and giving to him the benefit of every reasonable inference therefrom, we are of opinion that plaintiff fails to show actionable negligence.

In an action for recovery of damages for wrongful death resulting from actionable negligence, the plaintiff must show: First, that there has been a failure on the part of defendant to exercise proper care in the performance of some legal duty which the defendant owed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Yancey v. LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Tysinger v. Coble Dairy ProductsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Sowers v. MarleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API