Legal Opinion

Knoepfle v. Suko

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1961No. 7863PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Judge.

This is a suit for damages for injuries received by the plaintiff in a collision be tween an automobile driven by him and an automobile driven by Reinhold Suko deceased. Trial of the action resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $12,530.

Defendant made a motion for a new trial which was denied and he has appealed both from the order of denial and from judgment.

The grounds urged as a basis for a new trial were:

1. That the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

2. Errors of law occurring upon the trial of the case.

3.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Fonda v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. Thornbury v. MaleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. Elliott v. A. J. Smith Contracting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Shaneybrook v. BlizzardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Petricevich v. Salmon River Canal CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Germann v. MatrissSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Grenz v. WerreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  4. South v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. HillingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API