Springs v. . Doll
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
Does the principle of res ipsa loquitur apply to the skidding of an automobile resulting in injury to a passenger?
The principle of res ipsa loquitur has been frequently stated in various decisions of this Court and of other courts, and therefore requires no restatement or elaboration. There are, however, certain well estab- lisbed exceptions or limitations to the application of the rule. The most important of these exceptions or limitations may be classified as follows:(1) The apparatus must be such that in the ordinary instances no injurious operation is to be expected, unless from a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stewart v. Carpet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Dail v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Linden v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Dail v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Riggsby v. TrittonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Mitchell v. . MeltsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Etheridge v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.