Legal Opinion

Moore v. Hubbard & Johnson Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1957No. Civ. 17191PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

As stated by Honorable Edwin J. Owens, the trial judge, in an opinion which he wrote and filed, this is an action “commenced originally by the plaintiff Industrial Assets Company (a copartnership) against the firm of Buttress and McClellan (a corporation) and Hubbard and Johnson Lumber Company (a corporation). Subsequently the defendant Buttress and McClellan filed a cross-complaint for declaratory relief against Industrial Assets Company and Hubbard and Johnson. Still subsequently Hubbard and Johnson filed a cross-complaint against defendant Trinity River Lumber Company.

‘‘…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Tremeroli v. Austin Trailer Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Collum v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Kenney v. GroganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Elias v. Hewlett-Packard Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  4. Reniger v. Hyundai Motor AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Holmes Packaging MacH. Corp. v. BinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API